Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robb Demerest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Will be userfied if requested. PeaceNT 13:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Robb Demerest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete unsourced one-line sub-stub for an actor in a red-link show; nn - no sources, is he alive or dead? when and where born? is this show notable? is this it? unless something can be found, delete Carlossuarez46 02:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - I'm going to go ahead and speedy delete tag this; no sources, no information. --tennisman 02:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, IMDb shows nothing but this still-in-production "Ghost Hunters International" show, does not appear to be a notable figure yet. --Stormie 02:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The name is incorrectly spelled, there is this "news" report about the programme http://www.worldscreen.com/newscurrent.php?filename=scifi101107.htm but still Duke of Whitstable 03:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non notable (unverified), and too little context to constitute an article. - Rjd0060 04:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete and userfy -- I just pulled a number of refs on the show, Ghost Hunters International. It's a new spinoff of the definitely notable Sci Fi Channel series, Ghost Hunters. There was just a pilot this month and the series starts on the Sci Fi Channel early next year. Demarest (not Demerest as it's spelled in this article) has little Internet presence today -- a few passing media mentions and a virtually empty IMDB entry. The new show already meets our notability criteria and I am sure that Demarest, as one of the stars will soon meet it. Until then, we need a reliably sourced article and this one just isn't going to make it without more out there. --A. B. (talk) 06:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. —A. B. (talk) 06:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.